[BoS] Ce qu'on sait à ce jour

Salle dédiée à la série des Batlle of :
Stalingrad (BOS) Moscou (BOM), Kuban (BOK)

Topic author
Rama
Pilote Confirmé
Pilote Confirmé
Messages : 2727
Inscription : 18 mars 2005

#401

Message par Rama »

Rodolphe a écrit :Oui heureusement le modèle Ju 87 Ersatz du trailer n'est pas le modèle D-3 du jeu.
Les deux screenshots ne permettent pas de le savoir. Sur le deuxième on ne voit pas le coté gauche du nez de l'appareil, on se voit donc pas s'il y a une prise d'air ou pas (et à l'inverse sur le premier on ne voit pas le coté droit). Les modeleurs 3D ont très bien pu se planter en en collant une de chaque coté....
Je demanderais ce qu'il en est exactement.
Rama: Mesquin, Rancunier, Trucideur de projet, Malhonnête, Saboteur, Diffamateur, Chauve et Bigleux
Que du bonheur....
Avatar de l’utilisateur

gilles41
Jeune Pilote
Jeune Pilote
Messages : 1463
Inscription : 16 décembre 2010

#402

Message par gilles41 »

la prudence est de mise au vus de ce qui c'est passer avec CLODO et aussi avec toutes vos controverses

je pense fortement de laisser voir venir la chose sans s'affoler et même d'attendre une paire d'année c'est le temps qu'il faudrait pour être à maturité et un prix réduit par la même occasion
après on pourra discuter, sauf pour les impatients lol
ASUS TUF Z-690 PLUS - ASUS TUF RTX 3060 12Go - Kingston 5200 4X16Go
Intel I5 12600 - M2 500 Go /OS + SSD 500 Go + SSD 500 Go Data + SSD 1 To DCS
TrackIR 4 pro - Logitech G940 - Saitek Throtlle quadrant

le plus dur prends du temps l'impossible un peu plus ...
Avatar de l’utilisateur

Rodolphe
Pilote Confirmé
Pilote Confirmé
Messages : 2330
Inscription : 19 mars 2007

#403

Message par Rodolphe »

Rama a écrit :Les deux screenshots ne permettent pas de le savoir. Sur le deuxième on ne voit pas le coté gauche du nez de l'appareil, on se voit donc pas s'il y a une prise d'air ou pas (et à l'inverse sur le premier on ne voit pas le coté droit). Les modeleurs 3D ont très bien pu se planter en en collant une de chaque coté....
Je demanderais ce qu'il en est exactement.
A revoir ; ces deux images du modèle 3D in game.

http://forum.il2sturmovik.com/uploads/m ... 970286.jpg

http://forum.il2sturmovik.com/uploads/m ... 970285.jpg

Seul le premier prototype du Stuka équipé d'un moteur Rolls-Royce Kestrel , le Ju 87 V1, possède une excroissance sur le côté supérieure gauche du capot moteur.

Vu les proportions de la casserole d'hélice, la profondeur du radiateur et autres détails de la version trailer du Stuka, je suis très curieux d'entendre la réponse à ta demande d'éclaircissement.

:flowers:

Voir aussi la position des "Balkenkreuz" , camo symétrique appliqués sur l'extrado des Ju87 présentés dans ce trailer.

...
Avatar de l’utilisateur

NNFFL=Temeraire=
Nouvelle Recrue
Nouvelle Recrue
Messages : 141
Inscription : 05 juillet 2008

#404

Message par NNFFL=Temeraire= »

gilles41 a écrit :la prudence est de mise au vus de ce qui c'est passer avec CLODO et aussi avec toutes vos controverses

je pense fortement de laisser voir venir la chose sans s'affoler et même d'attendre une paire d'année c'est le temps qu'il faudrait pour être à maturité et un prix réduit par la même occasion
après on pourra discuter, sauf pour les impatients lol
pour clodo j'ai refréné ma pulsion d'acheteur ( une pointe de feeling) pour Bos je paye clairement pour voir , Rof est plutôt bien fait et sérieux c'est ce qui m'a decidé

J.j.
Pilote Confirmé
Pilote Confirmé
Messages : 3940
Inscription : 21 janvier 2005

#405

Message par J.j. »

C'était pas pour lancer la polémique, juste que la version "collector" de BoS c'est 67 euros aujourd'hui, et pour Clodo la version collector c'était 78 euros. Mais, évidemment, c'est sûr, il n'y a pas les mêmes choses dedans.
Avatar de l’utilisateur

NNFFL=Temeraire=
Nouvelle Recrue
Nouvelle Recrue
Messages : 141
Inscription : 05 juillet 2008

#406

Message par NNFFL=Temeraire= »

J.j. a écrit :C'était pas pour lancer la polémique, juste que la version "collector" de BoS c'est 67 euros aujourd'hui, et pour Clodo la version collector c'était 78 euros. Mais, évidemment, c'est sûr, il n'y a pas les mêmes choses dedans.
78 euros(12 euros trois ans after) pour une daube injouable " a l’époque" Nacy à toi :sleep:
Avatar de l’utilisateur

Rodolphe
Pilote Confirmé
Pilote Confirmé
Messages : 2330
Inscription : 19 mars 2007

#407

Message par Rodolphe »

...



Member

Members
Posts: 15


Posted Today, 17:44


Hi all, I don't post much as I'm more of a lurker in general, plus there are a couple of threads about the press event so I'll try to avoid repeating what has been said too often when giving my experience of the day. I apologise in advance if this is one of those "too long, didnt read threads" for you, but I enjoyed myself and would be doing a disservice to you if I didn't recount what I remember.



I was lucky enough to be invited by Jason to fly out from Dallas and check out the alpha which I was very excited to do. There were other RoF guys he wanted to bring out who unfortunately were unable to attend, such as Patrick Wilson who made the modded SP Campaign for RoF, but I'm told that like me he lives in Texas so maybe some other time. I did take my camera with me, but I'm not including many photos as it didn't take very good shots in the dimly lit carrier, plus there are plenty of much better shots/video available from Hooves, Einstein, and others which will turn up over the next few days.



I arrived at the Waterfront hotel pretty early, around 9am, and as I got out of the cab Loft walked right past me about to have a smoke so I called out his name and got a surprised look before I introduced myself and we had a quick chat for a few minutes before I checked in. After I checked in I had a long wait ahead of me, so I decided to see Oakland which felt like a good idea at the time when I checked out a map of the area. I planned to get off at the Arts district and make my way back down towards the hotel using the free shuttles that take you around, so I hopped on one at 1st street trying find something to eat for lunch. The idea didn't seem that great after a while since the area looked like it was getting dodgier the longer I was on the bus so I got off at 20th (around the arts district area) and started walking back the way I came. I wouldn't go so far to say I was excessively worried while walking back, but it was definitely eyes forward scanning around with ears listening as I made my way back. I ended up making it back to a nicer area with a few restaurants, had lunch, then walked back to the hotel to chill out for a few hours before the shuttle came and picked me up.



The shuttle was a few minutes late and I was the only one standing around waiting for it, so I was wondering if I completely missed it but it did turn up shortly after, at which point I ended up meeting a few of the guys such as Mastiff, Hooves, and Einstein from SimHQ along with a few other people I think were journalists covering the event. They had a lift arranged with someone else, didn't catch his name, so they hopped off and headed onwards to the event. I believe they got lost on the way as they turned up after I did using the shuttle, a problem which would repeat itself when I rode with them back to the hotel that night :lol: In saying that though, our shuttle driver basically got lost AFTER entering the compound where the USS Hornet was moored because he didn't know which vessel was the aircraft carrier..."umm, possibly the one with the aircraft on top of it?"



Hornet2.jpg



The event itself was great, it had an open bar and nice Cuban food along with the organisers and models getting around in flight suits which was a nice touch. I only had a few drinks over the course of the night as I wanted to retain my memory as much as possible ;) , so I'll do my best to remember things as I didn't worry about taking notes. Before the event started we were hanging out in a group where Jason introduced himself to all of us. The look on his face was priceless when I introduced myself, he said I looked like nothing what he expected me to, an "older, stately gentlemen" I believe were the terms he used for those expectations :lol: I hadn't been on a carrier in years, so I was keen to check out the aircraft in the vicinity before anything else. I started walking around taking some photos and ended up being pulled aside by Loft in a corner near an old school fully encapsulated simulator, so I spoke with him for about 20 mins and I could really tell how excited he was to be making BoS. I don't know much about the Eastern front so he filled me in on what to expect from the alpha, especially when flying the Lagg. Jason then came over and I got to speak with him also about plans for BoS and RoF. I respect that much of what I talked about with Jason and Albert was in confidence, but I want to say that the team had a strict deadline to make a playable build for this event, and talking with them explained that this was the reason for the relative inactivity on the RoF side of things. Also, the team would like any changes we see as a result of development in BoS to be translated as a part of RoF, so I expect we will see the Digital Nature Engine used in BoS become part of RoF, essentially changing the RoF we have now into a RoF 2.0 in the process.



The presentations were quite good and I believe Hooves has some footage of those, but the standout feature for me from the one of the slides was that there would be the possibility of 100+ players in multiplayer. Loft also discussed some of the data they will be using to model the aircraft during his presentation. They have a hold of previously classified Soviet documents that pertain to the testing of the German aircraft after the end of the war, so while he didn't go into a lot of detail about performance figures and what not, it is good to know that they at least have data on aircraft from the same perspective to allow for a more valid comparison between their test results. Later on Loft personally gave a demo of many different features of the alpha which Hooves recorded, so keep an eye out for that as its pretty special, especially the night sequence :)

Rocket.jpg data.jpg



I know everything in the alpha is a WIP, so take what I report here keeping it in mind. Nothing that I write here is set in stone and I am just reporting on my impressions thus far. With the presentation done it was time to get into the cockpit and finally have a crack at this :) I sat down and reflexively kicked my feet out looking for rudder pedals, but my feet were met by the PC case. Oops, twisty stick it is then :blink: At the desk there was a Thrustmaster joystick which was of the type that gets pulled apart to separate the throttle and joystick. The interface is the same as RoF, but that will be changing for the release so I'm not worried about that. I had a glance through the controls and responses and felt right at home as I began adding S curves to the rudder and pitch because of Loft's advice earlier about how twitchy the Lagg 3 is. There were controls for mixture, prop pitch, all that good stuff so even though we won't have clickable cockpits everything will still be mapped so we have a decent level of CEM when flying an aircraft. Between the Lagg 3 and the 109 Einstein was taking plenty of photos of these various aspects, so be sure to check out his article on SimHQ for those. There was a few identical scenarios for the 109 and Lagg to choose from for the night, so I started out with my usual free flight routine when flying a new aircraft in a Lagg to get a feel for it before I decided to actually shoot at anything. It began as an airstart and I found the Lagg was pleasant to fly in general and would do what I wanted without much issue, but I quickly found it really doesn't like doing aerobatic maneuvers. It has an underpowered engine for this airframe and bleeds off speed very easily. For example, getting it to loop was a challenge compared to the 109 as I had to have close to 450km/hr to perform a loop effectively without just flopping over at the top. I was glad I applied curves before I started flying because even with the curves enabled it was still touchy. There is a hard compromise to make because of the shorter lengths of our joysticks, so I think using an elevator curve at the least will be necessary to help flying the Lagg effectively. The 109 on the other hand was an absolute joy to fly. It is clearly the superior aircraft against the Lagg and has great control responses. For example, aileron rolls were very snappy and precise compared to the Lagg. Later on I also put time acceleration on after spawning and climbed up for a few mins to get some altitude to put the aircraft through some spins. Again, the 109 came out on top here and was easier to recover than the Lagg. I almost didn't need to attempt a recovery for the 109 in a left hand spin, but the Lagg on the other hand took a bit longer to come out of both spins once it was fully developed. The Lagg requires a very delicate touch with the controls and it doesn't take much deflection to throw you around the sky. If I could equate these aircraft to RoF equivalents, I would call say the relative easiness of the 109 makes it like a SE5, while the Lagg is something like a D.XII which needs you to put the time in to do well in it.



loft demo.jpg



For miscellaneous stuff:The canopy slide animations are nice and when I pulled back the canopy on the Lagg I didn't note any discernable speed decrease. However, the sound difference between the open and closed cockpits is great. You go from hearing the drone of the engine to hearing loud winds in addition to it. I doubt you will see people flying online with their canopies slid back to hear other aircraft in BoS ;) I didn't bother sliding back the canopy on the 109 in flight for obvious reasons, but I would have liked to have seen if it flew off or something.. :lol: . I tried various pilot animations commands from RoF, but these were obviously a WIP as I noticed only a few of them working. I was also able to shoot off flares, so its nice to see they are being retained. The head movements could use a tiny bit more oomph to them, especially laterally when initiating a roll and maintaining maximal roll rate. The positive and negative G influencing head movement up and down is good, but there was little movement from side to side.The flyby camera could use some work to reduce the relative speed between it and the aircraft because the speed at which these BoS aircraft are moving makes short work of the current flyby view we have in RoF. The mods were interesting for the 109, I asked Einstein to take pictures of these, but from memory I remember underslung cannons, 4 bombs, removable headrest, and reinforced windshield glass. Loft told me these mods, and certain skins, will become available to you through the SP campaign as you progress, allowing you to use them in MP. I asked for clarification about certain SP campaign aspects and he said there would be no need to 'succeed' at a mission to progress to the next one. As long as you stay alive to make it back to base you will progress in the campaign. However, if you want more points you should do the missions which require takeoffs and landings, versus the instant action style missions, because Loft wants to reward players who spend the time doing so. I tried the various mods and noticed the reinforced glass seemed to be bugged though as it was broken every time I loaded it, but this reminds me of another point. Cockpit damage. In one of the missions vs the AI, I maneuvered into a position to let the AI shoot at me which it did with no problems. Its rounds wounded me, destroyed several gauges rendering them non-functional and graphically cracked/destroyed, as well as cracking the canopy glass in the process. A great feature for which I am thankful the team has not neglected! :salute:



The big thing I really noticed between flying both of these was the feel of flying. There is quite a sense of inertia to these planes which is unlike what you experience in Rise of Flight. I noticed this particularly when I was testing the ground attack missions. In both the Lagg and 109 I would climb up and begin my attack run at about 30 deg nose down, quickly building up airspeed. I would make my pass, destroy the target, then climb back in a turn looking behind me to observe the damage, and it was the process of my climbs upward which were catching me by surprise. Both the 109 and the Lagg, but particularly the Lagg, would wallow out at the bottom of my dive as I began pulling out of it. Basically, I could have a positive nose attitude and still feel like I was sinking. The only other sim I have had this feeling is when I jump in DCS P-51. I know that is a strong comparison to make, but Loft aims to get a FM that is very close to the quality we expect from the DCS series and judging by how I felt after those ground attack passes I'm inclined to believe he and the team can do that. During the air-air portion of my testing I preferred flying the 109 over the Lagg. The 109 quite simply just does what you want it to do, whereas the Lagg you really need to concentrate and focus on what you are doing or else the twitchiness of the controls will put you at a disadvantage. It was becoming quite evident why it was nicknamed "the flying coffin." When it comes to the online component there is no doubt in my mind people will be gravitating to the 109 in this matchup, with teamwork being the name of the game if the Lagg's want to succeed.



The level of detail and their transitions are great and what I have come to expect from my Rise of Flight experience. No popping in at a certain range, no dots, just smooth transitions which allow you to identify aircraft silhouettes at a reasonable range. Just as it should be. Clouds looked to be about the same as we have in Rise of Flight, but when I flew through them I didn't notice any condensation, so that's probably not enabled yet. There is also a great snow haze effect when flying at a relatively lower altitude as you look into the distance. Between being low with the snow, haze, and clouds, it almost felt as if the horizon was blending in with the ground at times. The ground object capability has also been improved a lot compared to RoF, and while I didn't get to see the 50 v 50 tank battle alluded to elsewhere, the amount of objects/aircraft in these missions exceeded what we can see in RoF. I saw bunches of tanks and other vehicles from both the Soviet and German sides, as well as the aircraft in the air, all doing their own things. The trucks with the rocket launchers on the top were very impressive. They had some great animation as they positioned themselves to fire off salvos, with each individual rocket leaving the launcher until none were left. There was probably about 10 of these in addition to all the other vehicles/aircraft, and when these salvos were being fired at night time it was the only thing responsible for a slight FPS drop during my play, probably due to the ton of lighting/shadow effects required of these rockets at night. Another animation which is awesome was the bailing out of pilots. The canopy flies off and and the pilot falls out the back, with the parachute fluttering out the back in the wind before it catches and opens up. Unfortunately the bailout is not first person like in DCS-P51 (after the cockpit pops off it goes to 3rd person), but Loft mentioned it is one of those things he would like to have in the game down the road. I could however enter first person after I was stable in the parachute and floating down. The parachute and pilot are collidable objects, so don't try and be a smart ass and buzz some guy in his parachute or else you may end up killing yourself as well :P



After this amount of time I spent messing about, Einstein and one of the models behind me were talking about something. I think she wanted to have a go, so I got up to let her have the seat and take over. She didn't know how to fly it though, so I was there trying to explain basic maneuvering to her while she was getting shot at. I ended up just holding my hand next to the screen and getting her to replicate my hand angle to fly around, and while she shot at the enemy a lot she didn't really hit, but she did black out a lot after losing control and entering steep dives. I put a finger on the stick every now and again to prevent catastrophe, but she was having fun with it and that's all that matters. As the night was winding down I got a couple of in-pit photos courtesy of Einstein, and right at the end I got a nice photo with Loft and Jason. It was really great to meet both of them, Loft and Jason are both top blokes who want to create a great simming experience for all of us, and that experience won't just end with software like BoS ;)



model.jpg Jason Req and Loft.jpg



After the event was done with a few of us hung around for the final ghost tour of the night. The guides gave us a historical rundown of various areas of the ship, and with the amount of suicides the USS Hornet had seen during its time it's no wonder why it's believed to be the most haunted ship of the US Navy. I took a photo of an area which Hooves has a strange video of which I've posted for comparison here. There is some strange floaty thing towards the top of the photo which he also has in his video as he moves the camera around.

ghosttour2.jpg



The next morning a group of us all had breakfast and shot the breeze some more before it was time to go. I hadn't met anyone from the flight sim community before and was very happy and thankful to have had the opportunity to do so, plus I made some new friends there who I plan on doing some online flying with soon. Jason and Loft, it was a pleasure meeting you both and discussing things with you. I can tell you both have a real passion for what you are doing, so just keep your heads down and don't stress out over the forums too much. It will all come good in the end.



Overall, after my experience there and seeing the alpha first hand I will be pre-ordering as soon as funds permit it. If you are holding off on it, feel free to do so, but if the quality of what I saw there continues for the rest of the project then I expect you will be buying it anyway once some real reviews come in ;) All the best guys, sorry again for the long post, but I thought a nice indepth review of my experience was warranted. I don't think I forgot anything, but you never know.



*back into forum lurker mode* :ph34r:



- Requiem



TLDR: Had an awesome time, great quality for an alpha build, recommend pre-order.
Avatar de l’utilisateur

NNFFL=Temeraire=
Nouvelle Recrue
Nouvelle Recrue
Messages : 141
Inscription : 05 juillet 2008

#408

Message par NNFFL=Temeraire= »

Avatar de l’utilisateur

gris
WSO Co-pilote
WSO Co-pilote
Messages : 900
Inscription : 28 janvier 2008

#409

Message par gris »

quand j'avais poser la question sur la distance de visibilité des cibles
ont m'avais dit avec raison que c'etais trop tôt ..
maintenant je comprend rien a l'anglais et j'ai rien vu la dessus en français
sauf peut être ici j'aurais louper le truc ?
alors y a t'il des infos concernant cela ?
Avatar de l’utilisateur

Pollux
Chef de patrouille
Chef de patrouille
Messages : 5866
Inscription : 12 février 2010

#410

Message par Pollux »

D'après certain retour, on parle de 40 km... :innocent:

Bon j'ai finalement craqué pour la version Premium pour un total de 69.97€. Je me connais j'aurais fini par acheter les 2 autres avions un jour ou l'autre... :innocent:

C'est ma façon de renouveler ma confiance dans l'équipe de Jason. Ils ne m'ont pas déçu avec ROF alors pourquoi le ferait'ils avec BOS.

L'avenir nous dira si nous avons eu raison ou pas...:sweatdrop
"Il faut préférer la modestie de ceux qui s'associent pour combattre au triomphe passager de celui qui s'isole." Cdt De Rose CCG: https://escadrilleccg.forumactif.com/

bolt
WSO Co-pilote
WSO Co-pilote
Messages : 953
Inscription : 02 mars 2003

#411

Message par bolt »

Salut Gris,

Je pense que le passage qui t'interesse est celui ci :

"The level of detail and their transitions are great and what I have come to expect from my Rise of Flight experience. No popping in at a certain range, no dots, just smooth transitions which allow you to identify aircraft silhouettes at a reasonable range. Just as it should be."

Le niveau de détail et leurs transitions sont géniaux et ceux a quoi j'en suis venue a attendre par rapport a mon experience de ROF. Pas d'apparition brusque a une certaines distance, pas de points, simplement une transitions fluide qui vous permet d'identifier les silouhettes d'avions a une distance raisonnable. Juste comme il se doit.

Bolt

Taeht Dewoht
Pilote Confirmé
Pilote Confirmé
Messages : 3210
Inscription : 02 janvier 2008

#412

Message par Taeht Dewoht »


Ces images me rassurent quant aux effets d'ombre et de lumière dans les cockpit...
Avatar de l’utilisateur

Gourmand
WSO Co-pilote
WSO Co-pilote
Messages : 913
Inscription : 21 septembre 2010

#413

Message par Gourmand »

pollux18 a écrit : C'est ma façon de renouveler ma confiance dans l'équipe de Jason. Ils ne m'ont pas déçu avec ROF alors pourquoi le ferait'ils avec BOS.

L'avenir nous dira si nous avons eu raison ou pas...:sweatdrop
c'est marrant c'est exactement ce que je m'etait dit pour clodo, j'avais pas été déçus par il2 1946, et c'etait ma façon de renouveller ma confiance avec maddox game ;)
Avatar de l’utilisateur

Flappie
Apprenti-Mécano
Apprenti-Mécano
Messages : 337
Inscription : 23 février 2011

#414

Message par Flappie »

Hop, préco à 37 euros. Pour les 2 autres avions, j'attendrai qu'ils passent en promo, faut pas pousser mémé dans les orties !

@Pollux : on va enfin pouvoir revoler ensemble. :)
Image
Avatar de l’utilisateur

sport02
Pilote Philanthrope
Pilote Philanthrope
Messages : 5564
Inscription : 12 août 2006

#415

Message par sport02 »

merci Temeraire pour les vidéos ; a la fin de la première on a une idée des crashs au sol , c' est beaucoup plus intéressant que les états d' âmes des forumeurs
i7 6700k - ASUS Z170-A GTX1080ti - 16go DDR4 2666mhz HyperX Fury - SSD intel 330 180go - SSD Sandisk ultra II 960 Go - 2 hdd WD - Acer 27" 3D HN274HBbmiiid 1920x1080 + 2eme ecran samsung 22 " 3D - ffb2 crosoft/throttle hotas thrustmaster warthog + 2 Throttles Quadrant + rudder TPR thrustmaster/trackir 3/ son 7.1 - Volant DD osw + pédalier CSL élite fanatec - Windows 10 64bit
Avatar de l’utilisateur

Pollux
Chef de patrouille
Chef de patrouille
Messages : 5866
Inscription : 12 février 2010

#416

Message par Pollux »

À la différence que moi je ne me suis pas fait "avoir " avec Clodo, je suis donc encore vierge de ce côté là...:innocent:

Que voulez vous, l'espoir fait vivre !
"Il faut préférer la modestie de ceux qui s'associent pour combattre au triomphe passager de celui qui s'isole." Cdt De Rose CCG: https://escadrilleccg.forumactif.com/

bolt
WSO Co-pilote
WSO Co-pilote
Messages : 953
Inscription : 02 mars 2003

#417

Message par bolt »

Et a la fin de la premiere video le gars se crashe a priori dans un arbre. Ca va reconcilier pas mal de décu de COD sur ce point.
Avatar de l’utilisateur

Fuchs
Pilote Philanthrope
Pilote Philanthrope
Messages : 5870
Inscription : 19 juin 2002

#418

Message par Fuchs »

Magnifique!!
i7 14700k / Arctic Liquid Freezer III 420 / ASUS ROG STRIX Z790-E GAMING WIFI II / MSI 4080 Super GAMING X SLIM/ 64Go / m.2 Corsair MP700 pro / TM Warthog + TPR / G29 / TIR 5 / etc, etc, etc...
Avatar de l’utilisateur

Rickenbacher
Jeune Pilote
Jeune Pilote
Messages : 1815
Inscription : 30 juillet 2002

#419

Message par Rickenbacher »

Concernant le crash pour l'instant je trouve que le fuselage se comporte comme un bloc rigide, j'esp?re que cela va changer.

Les diff?rentes vid?os sont sinon plus qu'encourageantes.
Brebis syndiquée
Avatar de l’utilisateur

space-ace
Jeune Pilote
Jeune Pilote
Messages : 1012
Inscription : 25 octobre 2007

#420

Message par space-ace »

Les 2 dernières vidéos ingames promettent.
Les textures et l'aspect du sol vu à basse et moyennes altitude m'ont l'air excellentes,le relief et l'aspect de la neige sont bien rendus malgré la mauvaise qualité de l'image.
Les détails et l'animation du pilote, les vues dans le cockpit et le fait de pouvoir sortir la tête hors de ce dernier (comme dans ROF) me plaisent beaucoup.
Bref un ROF amélioré (même interface) qui annonce que du bon sachant que les bases (excellentes) sont là......
Après ça sera l'éternel débat sur les modèles de vol et la qualité de chaque appareils....
Au fait y aurait pas des screens du FW190 et du LA5?
Avatar de l’utilisateur

Fuchs
Pilote Philanthrope
Pilote Philanthrope
Messages : 5870
Inscription : 19 juin 2002

#421

Message par Fuchs »

Rickenbacher a écrit :Concernant le crash pour l'instant je trouve que le fuselage se comporte comme un bloc rigide, j'esp?re que cela va changer.

Les diff?rentes vid?os sont sinon plus qu'encourageantes.

Certes, cela apporte à l’immersion tel que ROF le fait très très bien, mais il faut aussi se rendre compte que ce n'est pas un simulateur de crash test ;)

Pour le moment ils sont en Pré-Alpha, peut être que çà sera amélioré mais la question peut être posé ;)

Rama?? t'es où?
i7 14700k / Arctic Liquid Freezer III 420 / ASUS ROG STRIX Z790-E GAMING WIFI II / MSI 4080 Super GAMING X SLIM/ 64Go / m.2 Corsair MP700 pro / TM Warthog + TPR / G29 / TIR 5 / etc, etc, etc...

Vylsain
Jeune Pilote
Jeune Pilote
Messages : 1402
Inscription : 24 juillet 2006

#422

Message par Vylsain »

Rickenbacher a écrit :Concernant le crash pour l'instant je trouve que le fuselage se comporte comme un bloc rigide, j'esp?re que cela va changer.
C'est déjà un peu le cas dans RoF. J'espère qu'ils trouveront une solution technique pour BoS. Moi je suis adepte de la séparation de tous les éléments de l'avion avec un effet boule de flamme, je trouve que ça ne rend pas si mal que ça.

A propos du modèle de dégâts, sait-on si on aura des déformations de la structure de l'appareil comme dans RoF ? C'est un gros point fort de ce jeu et ça serait super de pouvoir le retrouver.
Si l'ennemi jette l'éponge, faites gaffe à ne pas vous la prendre dans la gueule !
Avatar de l’utilisateur

Rodolphe
Pilote Confirmé
Pilote Confirmé
Messages : 2330
Inscription : 19 mars 2007

#423

Message par Rodolphe »

...

Loft Shows off some GFX engine features and some vehicles

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW_VyxGs ... r_embedded

...
Avatar de l’utilisateur

gris
WSO Co-pilote
WSO Co-pilote
Messages : 900
Inscription : 28 janvier 2008

#424

Message par gris »

la différence entre la cloche et rof
malgré le fait qu'aussi a clodo on se disais que il2 c'etais gage de fiabilité
le temps qu'ils ont mis a sortir tout les déboires et autres etc ..
tout ca n'a pas cours avec bos pour l'instant :yes:

et merci bolt
Avatar de l’utilisateur

tiger_33
Mécano au sol
Mécano au sol
Messages : 408
Inscription : 06 février 2005

#425

Message par tiger_33 »

pollux18 a écrit :À la différence que moi je ne me suis pas fait "avoir " avec Clodo, je suis donc encore vierge de ce côté là...:innocent:

Que voulez, l'espoir fait vivre !
Ben moi non plus(j'avais entendu les sons de mobylette identiques au 1er IL2 lors d'un premier trailer et ce malgré le fait qu'ils les avait bien planqués..) et la je me suis dit ACHTUNG!!


Bref je l'ai eu en version collector pour 15 euros 6 mois plus tard ...et en plus avec un lapin crétin lollol et çà, ça ne se refuse pas hein.

Alors pour celui ci j'ai bien le temps d'attendre la sortie officielle pour acheter..mais j'ai l'impression que cette fois ce sera la bonne pour enfin avoir le renouveau de la simulation Warbirds.
Vivons Heureux,Vivons caché.
Verrouillé

Revenir à « IL-2 Great Battles (Stalingrad, Moscow, Kuban...) »